Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is facing a new congressional confrontation after Republican Representative Thomas Massie announced plans to force an impeachment vote when the House returns to Washington in the week of November 9.
The move comes as Republicans confront the political fallout from the November 3 midterm elections and questions intensify over the Trump administration’s handling of the war with Iran.
But the most remarkable part of this impeachment effort is the identity of the lawmaker leading it.
Massie is a Republican.
And he has already prepared eight articles of impeachment against a Cabinet secretary serving under a Republican president.
In an October 26 interview with Roll Call, Massie confirmed that he intended to bring the matter before the House shortly after lawmakers returned.
“I’m not sure if I would do it the night we get back, but it would be soon after we return — if he’s still in the job,” Massie said.
His proposal is not simply a demand for Hegseth’s resignation.
It is a formal impeachment effort alleging that the defense secretary abused the powers of his office and violated constitutional and statutory restrictions on military operations.
Massie first presented the eight articles on the House floor in September, reading a lengthy resolution that challenged the legality of several major decisions made under Hegseth’s leadership.
At the center of the dispute is the war with Iran.
Massie argues that the administration conducted military operations without the congressional authorization required by law and that Hegseth bears responsibility for implementing those decisions.
The articles invoke the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which establishes procedures and restrictions governing the deployment of American forces into hostilities.
The Trump administration has defended its military actions and disputes the characterization that its operations violated the law.
Massie’s accusations extend beyond Iran.
His resolution also challenges military operations involving Venezuela, Yemen, the Caribbean Sea and the eastern Pacific Ocean.
The congressman alleges that Hegseth failed to comply with legal protections intended to minimize civilian casualties and improperly used his authority against critics.
Another article concerns the treatment of Democratic Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain who publicly discussed the obligation of military personnel to refuse unlawful orders.
Massie argues that actions taken against Kelly amounted to retaliation for constitutionally protected speech.
Those are allegations contained in an impeachment resolution, not criminal convictions or findings that Hegseth has been legally responsible for the conduct described.
Nevertheless, they place a wide range of the Pentagon’s decisions under congressional scrutiny.
Massie has also argued that the defense secretary’s conduct cannot be separated entirely from the president’s decisions.
During a September CNN interview, he explained that six of the eight articles involved actions he believed Hegseth carried out on Trump’s orders.
That distinction could become important as lawmakers debate where responsibility lies for military decisions made during the administration.
The timing of the renewed impeachment push is particularly significant.
The House is scheduled to return during the week of November 9 for its lame-duck session, before the newly elected Congress takes office.
That means Massie’s initial effort would be considered by the outgoing House rather than waiting for the new congressional term in January.
Massie has said he intends to raise the resolution as a question of the privileges of the House.
If the resolution qualifies under House rules, leadership would be required to arrange its consideration within a limited number of legislative days.
However, lawmakers would not necessarily have to vote directly on whether to impeach Hegseth.
They could instead vote to table the resolution or take another procedural action that prevents an immediate decision on the impeachment articles.
Massie has acknowledged that possibility.
He has also expressed confidence in his ability to attract enough support from both parties.
“I give it better than a 50 percent chance of passing,” Massie told Roll Call.
He explained that his calculation depended on Democratic support and the willingness of some Republicans to break with the administration after the elections.
“Will all the Democrats vote for it? I think the answer to that is yes,” Massie said.
“And then the second question is, do I get a handful of Republicans? And I think they’re probably more inclined in the lame-duck session to vote for it than they were before their campaigns were over.”
His comments highlight the political pressures facing lawmakers who may no longer be seeking reelection or who have already lost their races.
Massie himself lost his Republican primary earlier this year to a candidate backed by Trump and is preparing to leave Congress at the end of his term.
The Kentucky congressman has repeatedly challenged the administration over presidential war powers and congressional oversight.
His impeachment effort is another example of that conflict.
Democratic lawmakers have separately indicated that they intend to investigate Hegseth’s leadership and the conduct of the Iran war.
A change in House control would give Democrats additional oversight powers in the next Congress, including the ability to lead committees, schedule hearings and seek government records.
But Massie’s proposed November vote is a separate and more immediate development.
The political consequences could extend beyond the House.
If a simple majority of representatives approves articles of impeachment, the Senate would then be responsible for conducting a trial.
Removing a federal official through that process requires a two-thirds vote of senators present.
Impeachment by the House alone would not remove Hegseth from office.
Meanwhile, the White House and Pentagon have continued to defend the defense secretary.
Trump has publicly praised Hegseth’s performance, rejecting criticism of his leadership.
Pentagon spokesperson Kingsley Wilson has also described Hegseth as a transformative leader who has reduced bureaucracy and pursued the administration’s military priorities.
Those defenses stand in direct opposition to Massie’s allegations.
The coming debate will therefore involve competing accounts of the administration’s military decisions, the scope of executive authority and Congress’s constitutional responsibilities.
It will also test whether opposition to Hegseth extends beyond Democratic lawmakers and a small number of Republican critics.
For now, one fact is clear: a Republican member of Congress has prepared eight articles of impeachment against Trump’s defense secretary and has announced his intention to force the House to confront them.
The outcome remains uncertain.
But when lawmakers return to Washington, Hegseth’s future could become the subject of one of the most consequential congressional disputes of the post-election period.
About the Author
