A remarkable political coincidence is unfolding in Mississippi, where Democratic Senate candidate Scott Colom is locked in an extraordinarily close election against Republican incumbent Cindy Hyde-Smith — the same senator who helped block his nomination to a lifetime federal judgeship three years earlier.
The race remained undecided on Thursday, November 5, with election officials still reviewing thousands of outstanding ballots.
According to results reported by Mississippi Today, Colom had received 466,226 votes compared with Hyde-Smith’s 464,502, giving the Democrat a narrow lead of 1,724 votes with approximately 96 percent of the expected vote counted.
The margin was small enough that the remaining absentee and affidavit ballots could still affect the final outcome.
But beyond the uncertainty of the count lies an unusual political history connecting the two candidates.
In November 2022, President Joe Biden nominated Colom, then a Mississippi district attorney, to serve as a federal judge for the Northern District of Mississippi.
The nomination would have placed Colom on a federal court with lifetime tenure, subject to Senate confirmation.
Colom received support from Mississippi’s senior Republican senator, Roger Wicker.
The state’s other senator, however, took a different position.
In April 2023, Hyde-Smith announced that she would not return the blue slip needed for the nomination to advance through the Senate Judiciary Committee’s customary process for district court nominees.
The blue slip is a form used by the committee to obtain the views of senators from the nominee’s home state.
Although the procedure is a Senate tradition rather than a constitutional requirement, the committee’s practice at the time gave home-state senators substantial power over district court nominations.
Hyde-Smith’s refusal effectively prevented Colom’s nomination from moving forward.
She cited concerns about his record, including positions associated with transgender rights and financial support connected to his earlier political campaigns.
Colom’s supporters criticized the decision, arguing that it prevented a qualified nominee from receiving a full Senate hearing and consideration.
The dispute attracted attention partly because Wicker, Hyde-Smith’s fellow Republican senator from Mississippi, had supported the nomination.
The disagreement demonstrated how a single senator could exercise considerable influence over a judicial appointment.
But the nomination did not proceed, and Colom never received a Senate confirmation vote.
That is where the story might have ended.
Instead, three years later, Colom emerged as Hyde-Smith’s Democratic opponent in the 2026 Senate election.
Now the senator who opposed his judicial nomination is facing him directly at the ballot box.
The political circumstances are striking, although it cannot be established that Hyde-Smith’s decision caused Colom to seek the Senate seat.
Nor can anyone know whether he would have been confirmed as a federal judge had his nomination advanced.
Nevertheless, the sequence has attracted renewed attention as Mississippi’s election results have tightened.
The state has long been considered difficult terrain for Democrats in federal statewide elections.
Donald Trump carried Mississippi by a substantial margin in the 2024 presidential election.
And Mississippi has not elected a Democrat to the United States Senate in decades.
Colom’s competitive performance therefore represents a significant departure from the state’s recent Senate election patterns.
If ultimately elected, Colom would also become the first Black senator elected from Mississippi since Reconstruction.
For now, however, that historic possibility remains contingent on the final vote count.
On Thursday, election officials were continuing to process absentee and affidavit ballots.
Mississippi Today reported that approximately 3,600 mail-in absentee ballots remained outstanding, although not all were necessarily expected to arrive in time to be counted.
Voting-rights attorney Lisa Ross also estimated that between 14,000 and 18,000 affidavit ballots remained to be reviewed.
Those estimates describe ballots potentially requiring additional verification, not necessarily ballots that will all be accepted and added to the final tally.
Under Mississippi’s rules, voters who cast certain affidavit ballots have until November 10 to provide the documentation needed for their votes to be counted.
Counties face a November 13 deadline to certify their results.
The uncertainty has brought attorneys and election observers from both parties into the state.
Republican campaign lawyers have requested that election officials preserve affidavit ballots and related records in anticipation of possible disputes over the count.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee also sent a letter asking county officials to secure those materials.
In a statement reported by Mississippi Today, NRSC regional press secretary Samantha Cantrell emphasized the importance of accurately counting lawful votes.
“As the democratic process continues to play out, we are committed to ensuring that every single lawful ballot is accurately counted and the voices of all Mississippians are heard,” she said.
Colom, meanwhile, has publicly expressed confidence in his campaign’s position.
Speaking to supporters in Jackson on Thursday, he argued that the remaining ballots supported his campaign’s expectations.
“Anybody out there that does an analysis knows where this is going,” Colom said.
He added that his campaign believed the outstanding affidavit ballots would help its position.
That assessment was a statement of campaign confidence, not a formal projection of the final result.
Ballots remained outstanding in Democratic-leaning areas, including Hinds County, as well as in places where Hyde-Smith had performed strongly.
The geographic distribution of those ballots adds another layer of uncertainty to an already close contest.
Mississippi does not provide for an automatic recount based solely on a narrow margin. Any effort to obtain a recount would require a legal process.
The potential for litigation means the final resolution could depend on both the completion of ballot processing and any subsequent election challenges.
For Colom, the election has created an unusual public connection between his past judicial nomination and his present political campaign.
For Hyde-Smith, it means facing a challenger whose earlier effort to enter the federal judiciary she opposed.
The 2023 dispute involved the Senate’s power to consider judicial appointments.
The 2026 contest involves Mississippi voters’ power to select their representative in the United States Senate.
Those are separate constitutional processes, but the people involved are the same.
The contrast has become one of the most notable elements of the race.
A lawyer who once sought a lifetime seat on the federal bench is now seeking a six-year term in the Senate.
And the senator whose objection helped stop that judicial nomination is the incumbent he is attempting to defeat.
Whether the sequence ends with Colom entering the Senate or Hyde-Smith retaining her seat remains unresolved.
What is already established is the extraordinary political connection between the two campaigns — and the importance of completing the count before declaring a winner.
About the Author
